They’re just not well known enough to be included on the list And yeah, Passbolt still charges an sso tax. I’d argue it’s still better than forcing the full price on everyone who doesn’t want to self host. There’s nothing evil about bw adding a middle ground package between zero and $5. You really wanna grand stand and pretend Passbolt has the moral high ground here? They are charging way more, and way earlier, forcing you to self host if you don’t wanna pay full price, and even if you do self host, they charge full price for SSO. Let’s look at another sso tax complaint: SSO is often only available as part of “Enterprise” pricing, which assumes either a huge number of users (minimum seat count) Passbolt won’t even let you use the service at all unless you self host, without paying the full price. attached to a price tier, but with a reasonably small gap between the non-SSO tier and SSO tiers.īitwarden is clearly in category 3, charging a small difference to get sso.an optional paid extra for a reasonable delta, or. If companies claim to “take your security seriously”, then SSO should be available as a feature that is either: Passbolt self-host company: €4.5 per month per user - SSOīitwarden team: 3$ per month per user - no SSOīitwarden enterprise: 5$ per month per user - SSO Passbolt self-host community: free - no SSO
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |